JUST a month ago, David Cameron appeared to guarantee Michael Gove's longevity as Education Secretary, writes Michael Settle.
The Prime Minister told MPs: "We have had the same Education Secretary (for four years) and we have 250,000 fewer children in failing schools. If you have a strong team with a strong plan, stick with them, and keep on putting it in the back of the net."
Now, however, the Scottish politician has been substituted and moved to be Chief Whip; the one who keeps Tory MPs in line. While an important role, it is, despite No 10's insistence, a demotion from running a big department of state.
Remarkably perhaps, given Mr Gove's clear passion for the education brief, Coalition sources suggested the Surrey MP had, in fact, been on the Downing Street sofa with Mr Cameron and George Osborne to draw up the Cabinet changes.
Last night, the Tory leader praised his friend as "one of my big-hitters, one of my real stars" and insisted his new parallel role as Minister for TV was "one of the most important jobs in government."
In Westminster terms, this sounded, faced with criticism about the switch, as protesting too much.
Conservative MP Sir Greg Knight tweeted: "If spin is true and we are to have a Chief Whip who regularly addresses the nation, this will prove to be a mistake; hope I'm wrong.
Certainly, Mr Gove's "iron fist in a velvet glove" approach alienated teaching unions
During his four-year stint at education, there were repeated clashes as he attempted to push through far-reaching reforms to England's schools system, from exams and the curriculum to teachers' pay and league tables. He also spearheaded the introduction of the policy on free schools.
Mr Gove famously described the unions and academics who opposed his plans as "the blob" and "enemies of promise".
There was also the spat with Home Secretary Theresa May over the alleged infiltration of schools by hardline Muslims, for which he publicly apologised.
It seems Mr Cameron adjudged his colleague had simply made too many enemies and, in the run-up to an election, it is best to try to keep these to a minimum.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article