LABOUR is poised to announce that, if it comes back into power, it would seek to change the law to enable the partial renationalisation of Britain's railways.
The Coalition Government promptly denounced the move as a short-term gimmick conceded by Ed Miliband at the behest of the rail unions.
Under the proposal, public as well as not for profit firms would be allowed to run train services alongside private ones like Virgin and Stagecoach. The leak has come on the eve of the party's weekend National Policy Forum in Milton Keynes when the leadership was expected to come under intense pressure to endorse a policy of full renationalisation in the run-up to the General Election.
It is thought the Labour leader has had a number of meetings with the heads of the transport unions like Aslef, TSSA and Unite and that a compromise motion has been drawn up.
This criticises the chaotic franchising system of recent years and insists the current system is neither fair to passengers nor taxpayers.
It calls for a legal right for passengers to get the cheapest tickets and for annual caps on fare rises and states the next Labour Government will "devolve decisions over the running of regional and local services, including to Scotland and Wales, so that areas can bring together trains, buses, ferries and trams into a single network".
The East Coast Mainline between Scotland and London is run by a public company, set up when the private firm running it announced it could no longer deliver the service.
But the Coalition has said it wants another private firm to run the service by the end of the year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article