THEY are small, painted and are thousands of years old.
But despite their historic significance, the purpose of Pictish painted pebbles is still unclear.
Now an attempt has been made to recreate them in Shetland.
Robbie Arthur, a stonemason, and Jenny Murray, of Shetland Museum and Archives, studied the existing examples to understand their decoration.
Mr Arthur observed that external gable walls containing the unlined, stone-built flues for open hearths often show a dark, blackish-brown stain, very similar to the colour of the spots on the painted pebbles. The distillation of vapour, from the burning of peat, occurs when the flue cools, producing a sticky deposit.
When a fire warms the chimney again, this tar dries to a dark and shiny substance resembling pitch. It was this substance that was used for the experiments.
In an attempt to replicate the original designs, various methods of application were tried. At first, a straw was used, and this replicated dots, S-scrolls and lines similar to those on the Scalloway pebbles used as examples.
Ms Murray said that whatever their function, painted pebbles were likely to have been highly valued by the people who carried them.
She said: "Their numbers in the archaeological record appears to have been limited, perhaps suggesting they were of revered significance, held by a certain few."
A new catalogue of painted pebbles records the location of these finds throughout Scotland, with single examples from as far south as Dumfries and Galloway and west to the Outer Hebrides. It also highlights predominant clusters of finds within the northeast regions of the Highlands and Islands.
Mr Murray said why they appeared more frequently in Caithness and the Northern Isles remained a mystery.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article