The long-term future of Scotland's biggest petro-chemical plant and refinery has been safeguarded after UK ministers stepped in to guarantee a £230 million loan so that a massive ethane plant for the emerging shale gas industry can be builts.
Grangemouth was at the centre of a bitter dispute when owners Ineos announced last October the Stirlingshire site was to shut with the loss of around 800 workers.
But in a remarkable turnaround, the company has signed a contract with German-based TGE Gas Engineering on a terminal to store fracked ethane from the United States.
The UK Government's loan guarantee will allow the owner to push ahead with the issue of bonds to the public to fund the planned terminal.
Ineos's controversial chairman, Jim Ratcliffe, last year became a focus of workers' anger when he threatened to close the Grangemouth plant unless they accepted cuts to their terms and conditions.
Yesterday he announced: "Without doubt, this is one of the most important projects of recent times in Scotland, with implications to be felt right across the UK, not only for employment but also for manufacturing in general.
"Our ability to import US shale gas underpins the future of manufacturing at Grangemouth and across many businesses in Scotland.
"It is a vital step towards preserving the long term future of the Grangemouth site and those businesses that depend upon its continued presence in Scotland."
Scottish Conservative energy spokesman Murdo Fraser welcomed the Government funding, adding that it was another example of the benefits of Scotland remaining part of the UK.
He added: "They have helped to bring about a deal which will benefit the wider Scottish economy, while safeguarding hundreds of highly skilled jobs. Scotland cannot afford to miss out on our shale gas potential and the Scottish Government should be taking similarly pro-active steps to take advantage of this new energy source."
Ineos said it had invested £300m as part of a long-term survival plan to manufacture petrochemicals at the site beyond 2017.
However, the trade union Union, whose members were involved in the dispute, and some politicians said the wounds were still raw following last year's ultimatum.
A Unite spokesman said: "The confirmation of loan guarantees is obviously a welcome move and is part of the package which also saw the workforce make great sacrifices to secure the future of Grangemouth.
"Grangemouth's future doesn't just rest on securing investment, but also on the goodwill and hard work of a skilled workforce."
The Scottish Government said it is planning to push ahead with significant new investment planned for the plant.
Finance Secretary John Swinney said: "We are supporting these investment plans with £9m Regional Selective Assistance funding.
"We remain committed to working with all partners involved to ensure a thriving, sustainable plant at Grangemouth, and the new import terminal and ethane storage facilities are a key step in securing the long-term future of the site."
Michael Connarty, Labour MP for Linlithgow and East Falkirk, said he was "very pleased that the Government has continued with its plan and kept it promise to honour the investment of Grangemouth".
However, he also said there was still a "sour note" and "great feeling of resentment" in the community from the disputes.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander said: "Over £1 billion of infrastructure projects have now been brought forward as a result of the UK guarantees scheme and £36bn worth of projects are pre qualified.
A recent study by the The British Geological Survey estimates there are only 80 trillion cubic feet of shale gas under central Scotland and six billion barrels of shale oil. It describes this as a modest amount.
By 2016, Grangemouth will be a shale gas-based facility, which Ineos said was essential if it is to compete in world markets beyond 2017.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article