STRIKES would be "close to impossible" under a Tory plan to make illegal any ballot that did not have at least half of eligible workers participating in it, trade union chiefs have warned.
In a pre-election move, Conservative HQ signalled the party also intended to change the law to end "rolling mandates" for industrial action with a three-month limit on any approval for action after a ballot was held and that illegal picketing would be made a criminal offence.
Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office Minister, said the proposals were a "sensible and proportionate" package of reforms.
The Tories pointed out the introduction of the 50 per cent turnout threshold would have prevented around two-thirds of the strikes which had taken place during the last four years.
In other measures, the party said it would also require unions to set out on the ballot paper the precise form of action being proposed with a vote on each aspect of the dispute. At present, union members are only required to vote Yes or No in answer to a question as to whether they are prepared to take part in strike action and/or action short of a strike.
"I've always said unions can play a constructive role in the modern workplace," said Mr Maude.
"But I've also warned the more union leaders pushed for disruptive strike action without even persuading a majority of their members to vote, the stronger the case would become for changing the law."
But Frances O'Grady, the TUC General Secretary, said: "The purpose of this is clear, it is to ensure the fruits of recovery are reserved for the few and kept from the many."
Michael Dugher, for Labour, branded the package as "desperate stuff".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article