LESS than half of drivers convicted of killing cyclists in Britain are sent to jail, new figures have revealed.
Information provided by all 45 UK police forces also showed that more than a quarter of those guilty over cyclist deaths did not receive driving bans.
The statistics, taken between 2007 and 2014, have sparked fresh calls for tougher penalties to be imposed on drivers who cause accidents that kill cyclists.
In total, the figures showed that in 54 per cent of cases in which a cyclist was killed by a motorist, the driver was charged. While 73 per cent of them went on to be convicted, 44 per cent were jailed.
Last year the Crown Office lost its appeal after it claimed the sentence handed to Gary McCourt, who caused the death of Audrey Fyfe, 75, in Edinburgh in 2011 was too lenient.
Mr McCourt was banned from driving for five years and ordered to carry out 300 hours of community service, despite having a previous conviction for causing a cyclist's death by reckless driving in 1985. The sentence provoked outrage from Ms Fyfe's family.
Ex-Olympic cyclist Chris Boardman, a policy adviser for British Cycling, said: "Our legal system doesn't support fully enough the more vulnerable road user and it doesn't reflect the responsibility people have when they drive a car."
He added: "If you seriously injure someone or behave badly on the roads then I think we should see an awful lot more licences taken away, and I think that would very quickly improve behaviour."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article