The Scottish Fire and Rescue Service faces trial accused of a number of health and safety breaches following the death of a firefighter more than five years ago.
Yesterday at the High Court in Glasgow judge Lady Rae was told the the trial is expected to last 12 weeks.
No date has yet been set and the case has been continued until September in order to find a suitable court which can accommodate a three-month trial.
Prosecutors brought charges after firefighter Ewan Williamson died while tackling a basement blaze at the Balmoral Bar in Dalry Road, Edinburgh in July 2009.
About 20 people were rescued from the burning building, but the 35-year-old lost his life after he became trapped.
The service denies three charges under the Health and Safety at Work Act.
This includes a claim that there was a failure to prioritise Mr Williamson's rescue.
He worked for the former Lothian and Borders Fire and Rescue Service before the new service was formed in April last year.
The first allegation claims the necessary "instruction and supervision" was not provided to employees.
This includes an accusation that there was a lack of appropriate training for firefighters in relation to tackling basement fires.
The second charge states the fire service failed to provide "a system of work" that was safe and without risks.
Prosecutors allege there was not an adequate response to Mr Williamson becoming trapped in a toilet on the ground floor at the Balmoral Bar.
The indictment goes on to detail there was a failure to appropriately "prioritise his rescue" and utilise the relevant equipment to save him.
It is further claimed there was not a proper response to a breathing apparatus emergency situation.
The charge also alleges there was a failure to have in place an effective communication system between firefighters.
The final and third accusation claims there was not a "suitable and sufficient risk assessment".
It includes an allegation of not identifying adequate control measures in conditions of "restricted visibility and extreme heat".
The case will call again at the High Court in Glasgow on September 9.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article