THE BBC's Top Gear has been ruled to have breached Ofcom's broadcasting rules over a "racial" term used by Jeremy Clarkson.
The regulator decided the use of the term "slope" by the controversial star, during the programme's Burma special screened in March, was offensive.
The ruling comes just three months after Mr Clarkson was caught up in another racism row which prompted him to apologise and he was given a final warning about his behaviour by the BBC.
In that incident unaired footage from the programme came to light in which he appeared to use the n-word.
Today's ruling by Ofcom involved a scene in which the presenters were involved in the construction of a bridge over the River Kwai and viewers saw an Asian man walking on the bamboo crossing, while Mr Clarkson said: "That is a proud moment - but there is a slope on it." Two viewers were concerned that the word "slope" was an offensive racist term.
An Ofcom spokesman said: "Ofcom has found the BBC breached broadcasting rules by including an offensive racial term in Top Gear, which was not justified by context.
"Jeremy Clarkson used the word 'slope' to refer both to an Asian man crossing a bridge, and the incline of the bridge. This was scripted in advance. The BBC failed to take the opportunity, during filming or post-production, to check whether the word had the potential to offend viewers."
The programme's executive producer, Andy Wilman, had previously apologised for the use of the term, saying it had been intended as a "light-hearted word-play joke" and that the team had been unaware the term was considered offensive.
A BBC spokesman said: "The programme apologised at the time and explained the context."
The motoring show has faced several controversies over the years, including complaints from Indian and Mexican politicians over remarks made about their countries while filming on location.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article