DAVID Cameron has called for an "unconditional, immediate, humanitarian ceasefire" in Gaza to bring a halt to more than three weeks of violence that has killed about 1,100 Palestinians and 55 Israelis.
Speaking during a visit to Slough, Berkshire, Mr Cameron said: "What it is time for is unconditional, immediate, humanitarian ceasefire.
"What we are seeing is heartbreaking in terms of the loss of life, and the pictures that everyone has seen on their television screen are heart-rending. Everyone wants to see this stopped, so an immediate unconditional ceasefire is what is required."
The Prime Minister made clear he blames Hamas, the political movement that controls Gaza, for the outbreak of the current round of fighting, saying: "Hamas must stop attacking Israel with rocket attacks. That is how this started. It's completely unjustified and they need to stop as part of the ceasefire."
However, a former senior British diplomat called for talks with Hamas to bring it into the Middle East political process.
Sir John Holmes was UN emergency relief co-ordinator during the last Israeli invasion of Gaza in 2009, and said that, five years on, the current situation was "very much the same".
"I fear that, unless we escape this infernal logic of violence on both sides, in five years we will be in exactly the same situation again," he said. "Hamas is not going to go away and I think we have accept that, instead of just isolating Hamas, we need to talk to them."
Sir John, who is co-chairman of the International Rescue Committee UK, added: "I accept Israel is going to say 'Well, that is just rewarding terrorism' but that is the kind of language and attitude we have to get away from.
"The rest of the world has to say 'We can't go on like this'. We have to talk to Hamas ... Let's talk to them as we did talk to others and try to bring them into the political process and stop pretending they are going to go away."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article