PLANS to tighten union law following a row over tactics at the Grangemouth petrochemical plant have been effectively abandoned amid accusations of politicisation.
Prime Minister David Cameron had asked Bruce Carr QC to review the legislation governing industrial disputes.
But yesterday Mr Carr announced that he would recommend no changes.
In a statement, he said that he was concerned about the ability of the review "to operate in a progressively politicised environment" in the run-up to next year's General Election.
His inquiry was set up after accusations the Unite union tried to bully Grangemouth managers and their families, using a tactic known as "leverage".
At the time Mr Cameron called the allegations shocking, adding: "No-one has a right to intimidate, nobody has a right to bully, nobody has a right to threaten people's families, no-one has a right to threaten people in their homes."
In June the owners of the plant, Ineos, asked ministers to make it illegal for unions to intimidate senior executives during disputes, in a submission to the Carr review.
The company also wanted unlimited damages to be available for the illegal targeting of individuals, suppliers and customers, and it called on the Coalition Government to extend the strike notice period from a week to three weeks, to limit what it said were potential safety risks.
The TUC have accused Mr Cameron and the Conservatives of using the row over tactics to set up a politically motivated inquiry, driven by their political hatred of unions.
Union leaders now want the Tory party to cover Mr Carr's fee, reported to be around £1,500 a day, and other expenses.
TUC General Secretary Frances O'Grady said: "The Conservative Party should now repay to the taxpayer the costs."
In his statement Mr Carr also said he would produce a scaled-back report later this year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article