A HOSPITAL that has come under fire for failing to ensure elderly patients are fed and hydrated properly has again been criticised by inspectors, more than a year after the issues were first identified.
A team that visited Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, found one patient lost almost a fifth of body weight while in hospital, but did not see a dietician until 24 days after being admitted.
Another did not have nutritional screening until 10 days after arriving at the hospital, which should have been competed within 24 hours, while patient notes about nutrition were not always being completed accurately.
The unannounced inspection followed previous investigations, in May and December last year, when serious concerns were uncovered. After the follow-up, three of four requirements relating to nutritional care and hydration remain in place, while an additional area for improvement, around the care of patients with complex needs, was identified.
Jacqui Macrae, of Healthcare Improvement Scotland, said: "We found evidence NHS Fife was working towards addressing our recommendations. While we saw one has been met, three remain.
"We had particular concerns about nutritional care and hydration across the wards inspected. We asked NHS Fife to carry out an immediate review of all patients in one ward to provide assurance the correct care was in place."
Heather Knox, the health board's director of acute services, said: "We acknowledge that at the time of the inspection there were inconsistencies of approach in certain areas - these are being actively addressed through a number of initiatives.
"We are pleased the report highlights the improvements made to the management of patient meal times, the calm and organised manner of lunchtimes on our wards, and the positive input of our dietetic services and speech and language therapists."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article