SCREENING men for prostate cancer could reduce deaths from the disease by a fifth despite doubts about the diagnostic test used, a study has found.
The positive effect of screening increases over time, the research involving more than 162,000 men showed.
Over a period of nine years, screening reduced the number of men dying from prostate cancer by 15 per cent, increasing to 22 per cent after 11 years.
During the whole 13-year follow-up period, the risk of death was 21 per cent lower in men who were screened than in those who were not.
Screening for prostate cancer is controversial because the initial diagnostic test patients have, to measure blood levels of the biomarker prostate specific antigen (PSA), is so unreliable.
Higher than normal PSA readings can be obtained from healthy men, and low readings from individuals with cancer. For this reason, routine screening for prostate cancer is not carried out in the UK.
The European Rand-omised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) recruited men aged 50 to 74 from eight European countries, none of which were in the UK. Even though the findings demonstrated that screening reduced deaths, the authors said it was still too soon to introduce population-wide screening.
Lead researcher Professor Fritz Schroder, from Erasmus University Medical Centre in the Netherlands, said further research was needed to reduce "over-diagnosis" of prostate cancer cases. The research was published in medical journal The Lancet.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article