A CRIMINAL investigation into former traders at Royal Bank of Scotland over the Libor interest rate-rigging scandal is expected to drag into next year.
The UK Serious Fraud Office is understood to have written to the financial regulator to ask it to put off the publication of civil findings against at least two RBS traders.
It is believed this indicates the SFO is still pondering whether to charge individuals involved. Any Financial Conduct Authority disclosure may be considered improper if there was to be a jury trial.
It is understood that in at least one case the SFO has said it might not decide on whether charges will be made until next March.
The Edinburgh-based bank, which is 81 per cent-owned by the taxpayer, was hit with £390 million in penalties for its role in the manipulation of Libor - the benchmark rate some of the world's leading banks charge each other for short-term loans - amid a series of hefty fines levied on banking giants.
In 2012 the bank sacked four traders over their alleged involvement in the scandal.
RBS is one of a number of banks being investigated.
Allegations about an interconnected web of financial firms involved in rigging Libor were raised when Tom Hayes, a former trader at investment banks Citigroup and UBS, was charged in June 2013 with conspiring to fix key interest rates with employees at eight other financial firms.
Hayes, the first person to be charged by the SFO with Libor-rigging offences, is alleged to have variously conspired with Royal Bank of Scotland, JP Morgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Rabobank, RP Martin, HSBC and Tullett Prebon to manipulate the rate. He is also alleged to have conspired with colleagues while working for UBS and Citigroup.
He denies the charges.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article