ALEX Salmond has admitted that both sides in the independence referendum campaign have been guilty of stretching the truth to try to win the arguments.
In an appearance at Edinburgh Book Festival in conversation with historian Sir Tom Devine, the First Minister said: "People say and do things in a campaign because they want an outcome, on both sides, but once the votes are counted you get into an entirely different situation. People then have to sit down and do what's best for the people of Scotland and the rest of the United Kingdom."
The First Minister also predicted a referendum day turnout of more than 80 per cent, citing unprecedented interest across the country during the campaign.
Mr Salmond said: "I think the best bet of this referendum is a bet on an 80 per cent poll. If you can get odds on an 80 per cent poll, you bet it."
Sir Tom agreed, saying: "It will be the biggest poll in Scotland's history in terms of turnout."
Mr Salmond added: "Absolutely, and many of the people who will be voting will be people who are not touched by opinion polls and opinion surveys, which tend to discount people with no voting record, and I think that's going to be a major factor."
The political exchanges between the two, billed as a conversation between the country's pre-eminent historian and a politician who once flirted with becoming a historian, delighted a packed audience and sparked off anecdotes.
One saw the First Minister recall his own family background, with a Tory mother who adored Winston Churchill and a hostile father. Mr Salmond recalled an interview which prompted headlines that his father wanted Churchill hanged. His father had responded: "What I said was that hingin' was too good for him."
Pressed on the RBS bail-out and what that would have done to an independent Scotland, Mr Salmond, a former economist at the bank, stressed that the part of the group which was behind the failure was its capital markets division based in London and under UK regulation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article