Releasing genetically-engineered fruit flies in the wild could be a cheap alternative to pesticides, according to researchers.
A new study found that releasing the modified flies in an attempt to increase the male population could be an effective and environmentally friendly way to control pests.
Scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA) and Oxford Insect Technologies (Oxitec) said releasing the flies to encourage non-viable matings could be used as an effective way of suppressing populations - saving crops around the world.
The Mediterranean fruit fly is a serious agricultural pest which causes extensive damage to crops and is currently controlled by a combination of insecticides, baited traps, biological control.
Lead researcher Philip Leftwich said the Mediterranean fruit fly infests more than 300 types of cultivated and wild fruits, vegetables and nuts.
Of all of the current techniques used to control these flies, the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) is the most environmentally friendly, Dr Leftwich said.
He added: "The down side is that these males don't tend to mate as well in the wild because the irradiation method used for sterilisation weakens them.
"The genetically engineered flies are not sterile, but they are only capable of producing male offspring after mating with local pest females - which rapidly reduces the number of crop-damaging females in the population.
"Using this method means that the males do not have to be sterilised by radiation before release, and we have shown they are healthier than the flies traditionally used for SIT."
Researchers simulated a wild environment within secure eight-metre greenhouses containing lemon trees at the University of Crete.
When the modified flies were released, there was a rapid population collapse.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article