Nuri al-Maliki last night dropped his bid for a third term as Iraq's Prime Minister and pledged support for his moderate replacement.
The PM's refusal to quit had created a potential deadlock in the fight against the Islamic State (IS) militants who have forced thousands of Christians to flee their homes in the north of the country.
But last night, Mr al-Maliki gave his support on state television to the Iraqi Parliament's deputy speaker, the Shi'ite Haider al-Abadi, to form a government.
Flanked by Mr al-Abadi and other Shi'ite politicians, Mr Maliki spoke of the grave "terrorist" threat from Sunni militants before giving up on his fight to stay on.
He told viewers: "I announce before you today, to ease the movement of the political process and the formation of the new government, the withdrawal of my candidacy in favour of brother Dr Haider al-Abadi.
The move is likely to please the Sunni minority which dominated under Saddam Hussein, but was then sidelined by the relative unknown who came to power in 2006.
Critics accused Maliki of being an authoritarian leader with a sectarian agenda that drove Sunnis, including heavily-armed tribes, into the Islamic State camp and revived a civil war.
Last night's announcement came shortly after President Barack Obama said the US has broken the IS militants' siege and helped rescue thousands of civilians.
Mr Obama said it was unlikely more air drops of food and water would be needed, but that air strikes against the group would continue. He said the US would work with other governments to provide humanitarian relief "wherever we have capabilities" and could reach those in need, even as American warplanes continue a limited campaign of air strikes.
A US military and civilian team of 16 people spent Wednesday on top of Sinjar Mountain to assess conditions and see how many Iraqis needed to be evacuated. They reported that the number of trapped Iraqis was about 4,000 - far fewer than anticipated - and that food and water had reached many.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article