work will begin later this month to check the accuracy of crime recording across Scotland, inspectors have told MSPs.
Derek Penman, HM Inspector of Constabulary in Scotland, told Holyrood's Justice Committee he wanted to ensure statistics were being gathered "ethically".
His comments came as members raised concerns about claims published figures may not present the true picture of crime.
Tory MSP Margaret Mitchell said there had been reports that police officers had "massaged" statistics.
Mr Penman said inspectors would be looking at the whole process of how crime is recorded, using a sample of 7,000, five times bigger than previous samples. He said: "What we are looking to do is increase the sample size that we do, and increase it across the country, because I would like to be in a position to come back and give an assurance, one way or another to be frank, about the efficacy of that crime recording."
Andy Cowie, Assistant Inspector of Constabulary in Scotland, said: "Not only will the public make a judgment around official statistics, but Police Scotland need to have an accurate record if they are going to deploy resources in the most efficient way."
Mr Penman said: "If police officers are effectively seeing young people with alcohol and they are going along and seizing that alcohol, they are doing that within a legislative framework ... if that's being recorded as a consensual search, my own personal view is that it's slanting the figures significantly."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article