THE future of the NHS took centre stage at Holyrood as a referendum issue, with Health Minister Alex Neil insisting Westminster privatisation posed a threat to provision of healthcare north of the Border in the event of a No vote.
The Tories and Liberal Democrats, as Westminster coalition partners, were left subdued as Labour took up the cudgels during a Ministerial statement by Mr Neil. The Health Minister said: "We have a Westminster Government that believes in shrinking the state - and passes less money down to us in order to be able to do it.
"I don't think anyone in the chamber can think it's a realistic prospect that further deep cuts through austerity forced on Scotland by Westminster will leave services unscathed."
But Labour's Neil Findlay called the Scottish Government's claims "the most scandalous deceit of this referendum campaign".
Labour's attempts to defuse this issue were not helped by an intervention by North Ayrshire and Arran Labour MP Katy Clark who wrote to David Cameron on the very subject of privatisation and the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership). She said: "I have written to David Cameron urging him to stand up for the public services. TTIP would let companies sue if national governments pass laws that hurt profits.
"This is bad news for our existing public services such as the NHS, or other services that we may wish to take back in to public ownership such as the railways."
As this is one of the key tenets of the argument by the Yes campaign it did not help hold the line that decisions at Westminster had nothing to do with Scotland's ability to steward its NHS.
Bob Thomson, former chairman of Scottish Labour and a member of Labour for Independence, said: "The No campaign need to get their story straight. On the one hand Malcolm Chisholm says the privatisation threat posed by the TTIP is a 'red herring'.
"Yet Katy Clark has written to the Prime Minister on the very point that Westminster's policy could pave the way for private companies muscling in on the NHS. She is right. The bottom line is that the guaranteed way to protect Scotland's NHS and its budget as a public service free at the point of need is to vote Yes."
Mr Findlay said the greatest threat to the NHS in Scotland was the £6 billion of cuts in public spending that would occur under SNP plans to break up the country. He said: "Will the Cabinet Secretary focus on his day job and sort out waiting lists, huge problems in A&E, staffing and bed cuts, a social care crisis, and a lack of GPs, instead of supporting the most scandalous deceit of this referendum campaign to date."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article