THE typical proportion of income saved by households has halved over the last 40 years, according to research.
Lloyds Bank found that households saved around 9.9 per cent of their income between 1974 to 1984, against a backdrop of rising interest rates which reached double digits for the first time in 1979.
But after five years of the Bank of England base rate sitting at its historic low of 0.5 per cent, households are now saving around 4.8 per cent of their incomes.
Savings peaked in 1980, when households were putting 12.3 per cent of their income away, but the savings ratio fell rapidly after 2000, fuelled by rising consumer spending and borrowing.
Lloyds said low interest rates helped cut "the perceived need for households to hold precautionary savings". The average savings ratio fell to a low point of 2.2 per cent in 2008, before heading back up.
The savings ratio is based on the total income that is not spent by households, when can be saved in banks or in pensions and shares.
Lloyds took its figures from Office for National Statistics (ONS) and Bank of England data.
It also found the typical value of savings per household including cash deposits and pensions had increased five-fold over the last 40 years to reach £126,278.
In 1974, cash deposits accounted for 53 per cent of households' total savings, but by 2014 this proportion was 38 per cent, as the share of pensions as a proportion of total savings has grown in the last 40 years.
The study was released after it emerged two members of the Bank of England's monetary policy committee voted for a 0.25 per cent hike in interest rates, in the first split vote seen on rates since 2011, fuelling speculation over a rise in interest rates.
Andy Bickers of Lloyds Bank, said: "The proportion of income saved by households has halved, with less being held in cash savings than in the past.
"Getting into the savings habit early will help the younger generations to have a more secure financial future."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article