THE police watchdog in Scotland has criticised senior officers for a catalogue of failings following the suspicious death of a young man which was initially ruled a suicide.
A damning report upheld a dozen complaints by the family of Colin Marr, who died from a single stab wound to the chest in 2007 after an argument with his fiancée Candice Bonar at a house they shared in Lochgelly, Fife.
In one of the most critical verdicts ever handed down by the Police Investigations & Review Commissioner, officers were lambasted for destroying DNA evidence against protocol, failing to carry out an internal investigation into the force's shortcomings after Marr's death, and not meeting with Marr's family to take statements until after his body was cremated.
Scottish Liberal Democrats leader Willie Rennie MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, said "unprofessional conduct" by police "prev-ented the truth emerging".
Bonar told detectives at the scene that the 23-year-old stabbed himself because she had ended their seven-year relationship over an alleged infidelity, which he denied.
Officers accepted her version of events and the case was closed. A subsequent nine-day Fatal Accident Inquiry was unable to determine who inflicted the fatal wound, leaving Marr's loved ones in limbo. Bonar later emigrated to Australia where she now lives with her new partner, Bradley, and their young daughter.
But Colin Marr's mother and stepfather, Margaret and Stuart Graham, have always refused to accept Bonar's story and their campaign for justice led to the Crown Office ordering a review led by retired Strathclyde Police Detective Superintendent David Swindle in 2011. He ruled that Marr's death was "suspicious" and said it "should have been treated as such at the beginning".
A year-long review of the way Fife Constabulary handled the death of Colin Marr and complaints against the force by his family is to be published today.
Candice Bonar was contacted for comment but did not respond.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article