Ukip leader Nigel Farage was tonight selected by local party officials as their candidate to stand in the South Thanet seat in next year's general election.
Branch members formally chose Mr Farage ahead of three other shortlisted candidates as Ukip's prospective parliamentary candidate for the Kent seat.
Votes were cast after local officials questioned each of the four candidates in hustings at Odd Fellows Hall in Ramsgate.
Mr Farage will now seek to win the seat currently held by Conservative Laura Sandys, who won South Thanet with a majority of 7,617 in 2010.
Ms Sandys announced she was standing down at the general election after one parliamentary term, citing "a wide range of family demands" as her reason.
Mr Farage beat family lawyer Elizabeth Jones, barrister Piers Wauchope and Peter Bucklitsch, a fellow of the Institute of Financial Accountants.
Many had viewed Mr Farage's selection as a formality, but ahead of hustings he insisted he was "no shoo-in" and said that "rank means nothing" in Ukip.
He will now go on to fight for the South Thanet seat against Craig MacKinlay, the former Ukip leader chosen to stand for the Conservatives.
Ian Driver has been selected as the Greens' prospective parliamentary candidate, Will Scobie for Labour and Russ Timpson for the Liberal Democrats.
After accepting thunderous applause from his local party members, Mr Farage predicted opposition parties would now send their "heavy artillery" to scupper his hopes of securing the South Thanet seat.
He told the audience: "We can't for one moment afford to be complacent because we swept the board in 2013 and we swept the board here in 2014.
"We did and that was magnificent. But don't think that the heavy artillery from the Conservative and Labour parties will not be fired on this constituency.
"They will, they will, they will try very, very hard. They don't want Ukip breaking through into Parliament and they most certainly do not want me breaking through into Parliament.
"Somebody said I'm David Cameron's worst nightmare. Well, that's not good enough. I want to be Ed Miliband's worst nightmare, too."
Following his speech, Mr Farage smiled broadly as he walked past branch members to chants of "Nigel, Nigel, Nigel".
Mr Farage appealed for members to help him form a "Thanet Army", adding: "We have got to get people to do their bit."
South Thanet, which includes the coastal towns of Ramsgate, Sandwich and Broadstairs, has a reputation as an electoral bellwether.
Mr Farage hopes victory there next year will signal the arrival of Ukip as a force within Westminster politics and act as a springboard to further electoral gains.
Since 1983, when the South Thanet seat was first created, it has always been held by the party that has formed the government of the day.
While Mr Farage has no hope of occupying No 10, electoral success for Ukip could see him play a role in coalition negotiations in the event of a hung parliament.
When Ms Sandys secured the seat, she ousted Labour former minister Stephen Ladyman, who had held the seat since Tony Blair's 1997 landslide.
He defeated the constituency's most high-profile former MP - the Tory ex-Cabinet minister Jonathan Aitken, who two years later was jailed for perjury.
Mr Aitken had previously represented Thanet East, which was abolished when the new constituency was created.
Mr Farage stood in South Thanet in 2005, only to finish fourth with 2,079 votes, a 5% share.
But Ukip's recent electoral success has made victory in the seat a very real prospect, with the party performing strongly in Kent in this year's European elections.
Across the Thanet District Council area Ukip topped the poll, with 16,492 votes, more than double the votes cast for the second-placed Tories.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article