TWO in every five women giving birth in Scotland are overweight or obese, according to the latest figures.
More than 10,000 who had babies in the 12 months to the end of March 2013 were obese, representing 18.1 per cent of all new mothers.
Mothers with the condition were more likely to be from deprived areas, older and at higher risk of requiring an emergency caesarean, according to the report from ISD Scotland.
In the study which measured body mass for the first time, overweight mothers accounted for 23.8 per cent of the 55,542 deliveries in 2012/13, equivalent to more than 13,000 women. The figures mean that overweight and obese women accounted for slightly more births in Scotland than women who were a healthy weight - 41.7 per cent of the total.
A BMI of 25 to 30 is classed as overweight and 30 to 35 is obese. However, only mothers whose BMI exceeds 35 - "morbidly obese" - are considered abnormal by the health service and taken out of the normal clinical pathway for specific help and support.
Gillian Smith, director of the Royal College of Midwives Scotland, said: "We are in the grip of an obesity epidemic. Some of the knock-on effects for pregnant women include the impact on their mobility, and the mode of delivery because we know they will have a higher caesarean section rate.
"They will also have a higher post-partem haemorrhage rate, they are at higher risk of suffering stillbirths if they are obese and we have to keep an eye on hypertension."
Ms Smith added that obese women were more likely to suffer from infertility, and said that more needed to be done to confront expectant mothers about their weight. Obesity can heighten the risk of miscarriage, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, blood clots and having a baby with an abnormally high birthweight. She added: "The idea that you have to eat for two is a fallacy. Putting on a stone during pregnancy is too much."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "An action plan was published in January 2011 to help NHS Boards, local authorities and others to improve the nutrition of pregnant women, babies and young children."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article