COUTTS, the private bank that counts the Queen among its clients, has set aside £110 million to compensate thousands of customers who may have been sold unsuitable investments.
The business, owned by state-backed Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), has made the provision as part of a review of advice to clients dating back to 1950.
It comes days after RBS was fined £14.5m for serious failings in its advice to mortgage customers from June 2011 to March 2013.
The group, which is 80 per cent-owned by the taxpayer, has also put aside more than £4 billion for mis-selling payment protection insurance and interest rate swaps - complex financial products it sold to small firms.
Coutts chief executive Michael Morley has already written to 15,000 customers warning them there had been "some instances where the advice given during our previous advice process could have been better".
It is understood the £110m will come from a £206m provision RBS has made for the private bank. But it is the first time the cost of this particular issue, detailed in the Coutts accounts, has been made public.
This comes after the business agreed to review investment advice following new rules from the Financial Conduct Authority in November 2012.
The provision is not the first time Coutts will have had to pay out for mistakes. In March 2012 it was fined £8.75m for failing to ensure it was doing enough to be certain it was not handling laundered money, and a £6.3m penalty for misleading customers over a savings product linked to bailed-out US insurer AIG.
RBS said at the time of its half-year results this year Coutts had decided to undertake a past business review "into the suitability of investment advice provided to its clients", following a 2013 review by the FCA.
It said: "This review is ongoing. Coutts & Co is in the process of contacting clients and redress will be offered in appropriate cases. A provision has been taken to cover any potential liability arising from this review."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article