SKIN cancer could be made worse by inflammation that occurs following surgery to remove tumours, researchers in Edinburgh have said.
A study using zebrafish revealed how cells of the immune system that are important for wound healing can drive skin cancer progression.
Researchers stress that surgery remains the preferred treatment for skin cancer, but suggest that therapies to dampen inflammation after surgery could help to improve patient outcomes.
The team used live imaging techniques to watch how cells of the immune system are recruited to help heal a wound in living fish.
They tagged the cells with fluorescence so that they could easily track them in the fish, which are translucent, in real time.
Using high powered microscopes, they saw how immune cells called neutrophils are quickly diverted from the wound towards nearby cells that are on the cusp of becoming cancerous.
The team also detected high levels of neutrophils in human tissue samples of skin cancers from people whose tumours had open ulcers.
The presence of neutrophils in tissue samples was linked to poor survival of these patients, suggesting that inflammation may also play a part in driving human skin cancer progression.
Dr Yi Feng, a Chancellor's Fellow in the MRC Centre for Inflammation Research at the University of Edinburgh and one of the study's lead authors, said: "Our studies suggest that controlling damage induced inflammation after cancer surgery might improve the outcome of patients.
"An important next step will be to better understand how these immune cells are interacting with cancer cells. This will help us to devise therapies to reduce the risk of cancer cells that are left behind after surgery from forming new tumours and spreading."
The study was conducted by alongside researchers at the Universities of Bristol and Cardiff in the UK, and in collaboration with Aarhus University in Denmark.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article