The petrochemical giant, Ineos, is being accused of planning to flout the Scottish Government’s fracking moratorium by test drilling for shale gas in central Scotland.
The company has revealed that it is going to apply for planning permission to sink four or five wells to find out how much gas is trapped in underground rocks. This will not involve hydraulic fracturing, it says, and will be consistent with the government’s desire for further research.
But community and environmental groups angrily insist that test drilling would breach the moratorium and destroy public trust. They are demanding that ministers block Ineos’s applications.
A temporary moratorium on “the granting of planning consents for all unconventional oil and gas developments, including fracking” was announced by the Energy Minister, Fergus Ewing in January. He ordered local authorities and regulators not to permit developments while health risks were investigated and a public consultation was held.
The timescale for the investigation and consultation have yet to be announced, and they are now expected to extend beyond the Scottish election in May 2016. But Ineos has indicated that it wants to start test drilling and seismic testing for shale gas soon.
Bill Frew, who chairs a broad alliance of communities across Scotland opposing fracking and other unconventional gas developments, argued that test drilling was covered by the moratorium. “If this is not the case, then we cannot trust them to keep their word and the Scottish Government has badly misled Scottish communities,” he said.
He urged ministers to ensure that test drilling did not take place while the moratorium was in force. “Ineos and other developers are only interested in lining their own pockets, and are perfectly willing to exploit and trash our environment, and local communities,” he alleged.
Lang Banks, director of the environmental group, WWF Scotland, argued that Ineos should be told to await the outcome of the forthcoming consultation. “Given the current moratorium, pressing ahead with test drilling would be both irresponsible and premature,” he said.
Dr Richard Dixon, director of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: “Trust in the credibility of the moratorium is going to be destroyed if people suddenly find Ineos drilling holes at the bottom of their garden.”
He added: “Communities across the central belt will be up in arms if test drilling turns out to allowed while Scotland is supposedly still reviewing the health and environmental evidence on unconventional gas and fracking.”
According to John Wilson, the independent MSP for central Scotland, Ineos’s decision to press ahead with work related to fracking would cast doubt on the moratorium. “It is now time for the Scottish Government to come clean about an outright ban on fracking and unconventional gas extraction,” he said.
Ineos, however, suggested that it did not yet know if the shale gas under central Scotland could be economically exploited. “In order to determine this, we need to do seismic surveys, then drill a few wells and take core samples of the rock for laboratory analysis of the rock properties, including gas content,” said the company’s operations director, Tom Pickering.
The plan was to dig four or five wells in total, he disclosed. “This is fully consistent with the Scottish Government’s desire for further research and would not involve fracking,” he said.
“As and when we decide on locations for such wells we would consult with affected communities and go through the normal planning process."
The Scottish Government pointed out that Ineos had not yet made any applications to drill exploratory boreholes. “No fracking can or will take place in Scotland while the moratorium we have announced remains in place, a policy that has received wide support from both environmental groups and industry,” said a government spokeswoman.
“We are taking a careful, considered and evidence-based approach to unconventional oil and gas, and the moratorium and the planned public consultation will allow all stakeholders and local communities to have their say.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel