LEADING children's charities are calling for parents of youngsters to be given cash to pay for care as they demand a "bold and innovative" shake-up of the current system.
Six major organisations, including NSPCC Scotland, Barnardo's and Children 1st, have joined forces to challenge politicians to stop trying to outbid each other on promises of free childcare ahead of next year's Holyrood election.
In an open letter to The Herald, the organisations, including One Parent Families Scotland, Aberlour and Parenting Across Scotland, are calling on the main parties to put children's needs ahead of party politics and back the findings of a major inquiry into the issue.
The charities, all members of a Scottish Childcare Alliance which was launched last year, argue that manifesto promises of more free childcare do not solve all the problems faced by parents. Instead, they are calling for a more "mature and sophisticated" approach.
In particular, they say a focus on wraparound cover for working parents does not suit many people, including students, or those trying to get into the labour market, who may need childcare to attend training or job interviews.
The group is calling for the findings of the recent McLean Commission on Childcare Reform to be implemented.
Their letter says: "These offer us a bold and innovative vision for the shake-up and redesign of our childcare system in a way that will better answer the needs of all children and parents, meeting childcare requirements with flexibility and increased choice."
The McLean proposals included the suggestion that parents of children too young for free nursery care should get a cash sum equivalent to the subsidy they would receive if their children were old enough.
This would help compensate for the fact that families in the UK with very young children receive significantly less cash through paid-for parental leave than in most other countries, the report said.
Among the commission's other recommendations were a sliding system of rates for childcare to ensure those with a low income did not have to spend more than 10 per cent of their household income on childcare.
The charities say implementing such policies will require cooperation across the political spectrum, in the same way consensus brought about improvements in the lives of children in care in Scotland.
"Scotland can do without more party political divisions on universally funded childcare hours, but it cannot do without a comprehensive and transformative shift in how we deliver childcare in this country," the letter says.
It has been signed by SallyAnn Kelly, chief executive of children's charity Aberlour; Martin Crewe, director of Barnardo's Scotland; Alison Todd, chief executive of Children 1st; NSPCC Scotland director Matt Forde; Ann McKenzie, deputy director of One Parent Families Scotland; and Clare Simpson, project manager at Parenting Across Scotland.
Ms Kelly said: "A modern Scotland will need child care that is flexible enough for those families where one or both parents work irregular hours, or for those, including students, who are outside the labour market.
"This means that we will need to engage in a more sophisticated conversation about what that needs to look like for families and how every family can benefit from the provision of free child care hours – too many families are currently missing out on their full entitlement because of inflexibility in the system."
She praised the work carried out by Colin McLean, adding: "The report from the Commission on Childcare offers a fantastic opportunity for key providers of child care, especially local authorities, to review existing provision in a way which really focuses on the needs of children yet offers greater flexibility and choice to families."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel