The Scottish Government's budget is set to fall by an estimated £1 billion a year as part of a new austerity drive ordered by George Osborne.
The Chancellor has told Conservative ministers to draw up plans cut the size of their departments by as much as 40 per cent, in a bid to find £20 billion over the next four years.
Schools and hospitals spending south of the border will be protected, a decision which means the scale of the cuts to the Scottish Government's 'block grant' will be smaller than it would have been otherwise.
Mr Osborne told MPs that the savings would mean departments would have to do "more for less".
The SNP's deputy leader Stewart Hosie predicted some of the high targets would prove "completely unmanageable".
Mr Osborne risked "setting himself up for a very large fall," he said.
"Perhaps he's setting the bar high and he'll appear to be the good guy if it's less when push comes to shove."
Shadow chancellor Chris Leslie said that Mr Osborne had no plan for "sensible savings" to public services.
"Departments are not being given a clear sense from the Treasury of what to plan for in the spending review, particularly since we've seen three sets of spending plans in the last few months," he said.
"Britain's public services need a coherent plan to balance the books and put productivity first, not a Chancellor who chops and changes from month to month, ditching manifesto commitments."
Within hours, however, another cabinet minister appeared to rubbish Mr Osborne's figures, calling the 40 per cent target "aspirational".
Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said: "Past experience would suggest that initial pitching by the Treasury should be regarded as aspirational and a ranging shot."
He added, however: "It is clear that to deliver the overall fiscal trajectory departments collectively will have to make substantial savings, double digit percentage savings."
Each unprotected department has been asked to come up with savings plans totalling 25 per cent and 40 per cent of their budget.
The designation of some departments as protected means that the axe will fall heavier on others, Mr Osborne acknowledged.
AMong those ring-fencing are defence, education, health and international aid.
"It is right for a Government to make a judgment about its priorities. We have made those commitments," he said.
"That obviously increases pressures elsewhere in government. But government is ultimately about making these choices. I think we have made the right choices."
Mr Osborne suggested that part of the savings could come from giving people "more say over their lives".
He also made clear that departments should draw up plans to sell off billions of pounds worth of land and other public sector assets.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) alone currently owns around 1 per cent of all the land in the UK - some 227,300 hectares - according to a Treasury paper .
Earlier this month Mr Osborne confirmed plans to cut £12 billion from the welfare bill and save an extra £5 billion from a crackdown on tax avoidance.
He said that the latest cuts would complete the Conservatives' plan to eliminate the UK's Budget deficit.
"We have shown with careful management of public money we can get more for less and give working people real control over the decisions that affect them and their communities," he said.
"The spending review will deliver better government and economic security."
Using the Treasury's own calculation the Scottish Government' could have expected that its block grant would be cut by approximately £1.5 billion a year.
However, once protected spending is removed, that figure falls to £1billion.
The Treasury refused last night to say how by much Scotland Government spending would fall.
The result of the spending review will be announced on November 25.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article