Dementia sufferer Lord Janner will not be compelled to attend court next week when his case comes to the Old Bailey.
The 87-year-old peer was due for his first Crown Court appearance over 22 child sex abuse charges spanning three decades.
He faces 15 counts of indecent assault and seven counts of a separate sexual offence against a total of nine alleged victims over the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s.
Mr Justice Sweeney, presiding judge for the south eastern circuit, will hear the case at the Old Bailey from 2.30pm on Tuesday.
But sources at the court confirmed that the senior judge would not require Lord Janner to be present for the hearing.
The peer had been forced to turn up at Westminster Magistrates' Court for an initial hearing after a week-long wrangle over the issue.
His attendance lasted just 59 seconds and came after numerous attempts by his defence lawyers - three court hearings over a week - to avoid him having to attend.
His legal team insisted he was too ill to go because of his advanced dementia.
But two senior judges ruled the former Labour peer and MP must attend because of "the obvious and strong public interest in ensuring those summoned to court attend when required".
Dressed in a soiled bottle green cardigan, blue T-shirt and navy trousers and, using a walking stick, he entered the courtroom saying: "Oooh, this is wonderful."
He sat at a desk near the entrance used for vulnerable witnesses and looked around the room before being asked if he was Lord Janner.
He replied: "Yes."
The peer was escorted into the courtroom by a minder and woman believed to be his daughter.
Calling him "daddy", she said: "We're going to go home and have an ice cream."
Janner, of Springfield Avenue, in Muswell Hill, north London, is on unconditional bail.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here