After 43 years in prison and 30 parole hearings, US parole officials have again decided it is safe to free Charles Manson follower Bruce Davis.
They recommended that Davis be paroled in the 1969 slayings of musician Gary Hinman and stuntman Donald "Shorty" Shea.
It is the fourth time for such a recommendation, but the 72-year-old Davis remains imprisoned at California Men's Colony in San Luis Obispo.
The previous three such recommendations by the Board of Parole Hearings were blocked, once by former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and twice by governor Jerry Brown.
Mr Brown most recently rejected Davis' parole a year ago, saying he remains dangerous despite his age. It will be about five months before Mr Brown decides on Thursday's recommendation.
"I am pleased that the board again followed the law and did the right thing, and I am hopeful that the governor will do likewise," Davis's lawyer, Michael Beckman, said after the hearing.
Davis was not involved in the notorious killings of actress Sharon Tate and six others, but Los Angeles County deputy district attorney John Morris said the lesser-known slayings are plenty to keep him behind bars.
"The heinousness of the crimes held southern California in the grip of fear for months," said Mr Morris, who heads the district attorney's parole division and drove to San Luis Obispo to oppose Davis's parole. "The reason for the crimes was to incite the race war of Helter Skelter."
Manson interpreted the Beatles song to symbolise an Armageddon-like war between whites and blacks. He convinced some of his followers that the killings would help spark the war and benefit his "family" of disciples.
Since his conviction, Davis has become a born-again Christian who earned a doctoral degree in philosophy of religion and ministers to other inmates.
He is serving a life sentence for two counts of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder and robbery.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here