Former rectors of Edinburgh University have spoken out against proposed changes to the way universities are governed.
They have expressed "extreme concern" that measures contained in Scottish Government legislation are "seeking to abolish the right of rectors to chair university courts and to downgrade the position of rector to one a university can choose to continue or not".
A letter signed by politicians Lord David Steel and Sir Tam Dalyell, football commentator Archie Macpherson, author Muriel Gray and musician Donnie Munro calls on the Government to rethink its plans.
It is also signed by footballer John Colquhoun, Scottish neurologist Malcolm Macleod and journalist Jonathon WG Wills.
The Higher Education Governance (Scotland) Bill would standardise the way chairs of university courts are elected across Scotland.
Currently, the universities of Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh, Glasgow and St Andrews all have elected rectors who represent students.
Rectors also chair meetings of the courts which run universities.
However there are fears the Bill will reduce the role of students in selecting and voting for rectors, and threaten the right of democratically elected rectors to chair university courts.
The letter says: "The rector is part of the Scottish academic tradition and part of our democracy, which should be preserved.
"We are extremely concerned that the Scottish Government in its proposed legislation on university governance is seeking to abolish the right of rectors to chair university courts and to downgrade the position of rector to one a university can choose to continue or not.
"The position of rector was introduced to bring democracy and transparency to the governance of universities and it has managed to do this successfully for many years.
"We feel that the proposals in the Scottish Government's Bill takes away an ancient democratic right unique to Scotland and seeks to replace it with a system where the chair of the university's highest governing body will be someone pre-approved and vetted by a government process."
It comes as Gordon Brown, another former Edinburgh University rector, also attacked the Government's plans.
In a letter to Nicola Sturgeon, the former prime minister said: "It cannot be right that in 2015, at a time when we are opening up public appointments to both scrutiny and election, that we replace a democratic right that ensures transparency with a new law that may mean that instead of democratic election the chair of the university's highest governing body is pre-approved and vetted from outside by a government process."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Rectors play an important role in the 'ancient' institutions, raising the profile of the sector and representing students. The Scottish Government is clear that there is no intention at all to abolish the position of rector.
"The Scottish Government will not be involved in the appointment of an individual chair at any institution so the suggestion of government exerting greater direct control over the sector is just wrong.
"Over the summer, we asked all higher education stakeholders, including current rectors, about their views on how a model for elected chairs of court might work in practice.
"As the Higher Education Bill progresses through Parliament, we will continue to listen to all constructive views and suggestions made."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here