Former Conservative Defence Secretary Liam Fox has hit out at the pro-Union campaign in last year's independence referendum.
The Tory MP accused Better Together of failing to make a positive case for the UK.
He suggested that the same mistakes must not be repeated in any second vote.
And he urged on the pro-UK side to "start today" and begin setting out why Scots benefit from rejecting independence.
He was speaking during a fringe at the Conservative party conference in Manchester.
He was pressed on the issue a Tory activist who accused David Cameron of a "cack-handed" response to the independence result.
The Prime Minister has faced criticism for announcing plans to restrict Scottish MPs voting rights just hours after Scotland voted to remain in the UK.
Mr Fox said: "I think there was a major, major problem with the Better Together campaign.
“That was that it was not talking to the right audience, because it kept saying why the Union was better having Scotland in it.
“Which was not what Scots were interested in.
“They wanted to know why they would be better off being in the Union.
“And we have to start making that case. That it is about the people of Scotland, not about being in the institution of a Union. “
He added that events in the last year had made the case stronger.
“We got to say to people in Scotland ‘you are better off being in the Union. Because had you voted last year for independence with oil prices plummeted you would find yourself in quite a pickle...’
“You have got to tell Scots why it is good for them. It was all very nice for us to enjoy why the Union was stronger having us Scots in it but that was not actually what the voters in Scotland were discussing or what they wanted to hear.
“So maybe next time - and maybe starting today - we might want to make the case in a positive way for why they benefit from being in the Union and not the other way round.”
He also called on America back a UK exit from an "unreformed EU".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel