US presidential candidate and golf course owner Donald Trump has begun the latest round in his legal fight against a Scottish offshore wind farm project.
The Republican billionaire wants five Supreme Court justices to allow his appeal over the 11-turbine scheme off the Aberdeenshire coast, which was approved by the Scottish government in 2013.
Mr Trump, who was not at the hearing in London today, says the wind farm will spoil the view from his luxury golf links at the Menie Estate, about 3.5 kilometres away, which he bought and developed in 2006.
Previously, the 69-year-old businessman, whose mother was Scottish, has described turbines as "ugly monstrosities" and has said he would pull the plug on further plans for the resort near Balmedie if the project goes ahead.
The European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre (EOWDC) is a joint venture by Vattenfall Wind Power and Aberdeen Renewable Energy Group, who say the turbines would be capable of yielding enough electricity to power 68,000 UK households over a year.
After two defeats in the Scottish courts, lawyers for Mr Trump are asking a panel headed by Lord Neuberger to rule on the correct construction of the Electricity Act 1989 and whether a condition attached to the consent for the wind farm was "so imprecise and uncertain" that it was unenforceable and destroyed the consent.
The consent granted by the Scottish government, in March 2013, was subject to a condition requiring the submission of a detailed design statement for approval before the development was started.
The justices are expected to reserve their decision at the end of the contested day-long hearing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel