A COLLEGE principal accused of feathering his own nest with a £304,000 severance package may refuse to give evidence on the issue.
John Doyle, the former head of Coatbridge College, in Lanarkshire, said he was bound by the terms of a confidentiality agreement.
Holyrood's public audit committee is currently investigating £850,000 worth of severance payments made to a number of managers from Coatbridge in 2013 when it merged with other institutions to form New College Lanarkshire.
Mr Doyle, who is expected to appear before the committee later this month, told the committee in written evidence that he wanted to clear his name, but was bound by a compromise agreement.
He said: "Thank you for your email requesting that I should submit evidence to refute the allegations made by Ms Gardner to your committee.
"In her statement she asserts that I, amongst other things, withheld information, acted outwith my remit and colluded with John Gray, chair of the board. She also states that she had difficulty obtaining information and thus based her findings on limited evidence.
"I am now advised by my legal representative that I may be in breach of my compromise agreement with my previous employer, now New College Lanarkshire, if I speak to this subject."
Mr Doyle has asked the committee to seek written assurances from New College Lanarkshire that he could "speak freely" when called before the committee.
He added: "I deeply regret that I am unable to furnish the committee directly with this information, but do hope that you will take the time to seek out this information and allow the facts to be known and my good name to be cleared."
Mr Doyle, a member of his staff and five managers shared half of a £1.7 million severance pot among them when the college was merged into New College Lanarkshire.
The committee also expects to hear from Mr Gray, the Scottish Funding Council, members of the college remuneration committee, internal and external auditors, the former director of finance and the former head of human resources.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel