Ministers have refused to give consent to two proposed wind farms in the Highlands as they would have a "significant and unacceptable" impact on landscape.
Energy minister Fergus Ewing said the Scottish Government had turned down a bid for a 22-turbine wind farm at the Sallachy and Duchally estate in Sutherland, along with a 23-turbine development at Glencassley estate, by Lairg, also in Sutherland.
Both developments would have an impact on an area of wild land while the Sallachy wind farm would also affect the landscape of the Assynt-Coigach national scenic area.
Mr Ewing said: "The Scottish Government's policy on wind farms strikes a careful balance between maximising Scotland's huge green energy potential and protecting some of our most scenic landscape and wild land area.
"We have been clear that wind farms can only be built in the right places and Scottish planning policy sets out rigorous steps to ensure wind farms are sited appropriately and sensitively.
"I have considered these applications fully and recognise the efforts made by the applicants to mitigate the potential impacts of the developments.
"However, I have refused permission as the proposals would still have significant and unacceptable landscape and visual impacts in the local areas, and these are not outweighed by any wider policy benefit."
Conservation campaigners at the John Muir Trust welcomed the decision.
Stuart Brooks, the charity's chief executive, said: "This is tremendous news for everyone who has worked to highlight that these developments were proposed in the wrong place.
"We are particularly delighted that the Scottish Government is following through and using the wild land areas map to provide protection to Scotland's nationally important wild land areas."
Head of policy Helen McDade added: "The decision is a victory for those of us who have long campaigned for Scotland's wild land to be protected from industrial-scale development.
"We hope this persuades energy companies looking at potential developments in wild land areas to get a clear message that the Government will protect these special places in the public interest."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel