Downing Street has denied that David Cameron is planning to drop his demand for a ban on in-work benefits for new EU migrants in the face of opposition from European capitals.
The Times quoted an unnamed European diplomat as saying that the proposal for workers from the 27 other EU states to be denied benefits until they have been in the UK for four years "does not fly".
The diplomat said EU institutions were expecting Mr Cameron to come forward with new proposals at December's summit of the European Council, when he is hoping to get agreement from fellow national leaders on a package of reforms to the UK's membership.
But a Number 10 spokesman insisted there was no change to the proposals set out by the Prime Minister in a letter to European Council president Donald Tusk earlier this month.
"The position has not changed from the letter the Prime Minister sent to the Council president," the spokesman told a Westminster media briefing.
Mr Cameron fuelled speculation that he may be willing to make concessions on the benefit proposals when he said he was "open to different ways of dealing with this issue".
In a speech as he published the letter on November 10, the PM said: "We have proposed that people coming to Britain from the EU must live here and contribute for four years before they qualify for in-work benefits or social housing, and that we should end the practice of sending child benefit overseas.
"Now, I understand how difficult some of these welfare issues are for other member states, and I am open to different ways of dealing with this issue."
Mr Cameron is expected to speak with Mr Tusk and European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker ahead of the December 17 summit in Brussels to assess the chances of securing agreement, which would allow him to proceed with the promised in/out referendum in early 2016.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel