Scotland would be "entirely bankrupt" and probably "scuttling" for help had it secured independence, a business minister has claimed.
Conservative frontbencher Nick Boles told MPs he would use a meeting with oil and gas companies to discuss not only concerns over an apprenticeship tax but also their views on the SNP's oil revenue predictions ahead of last year's independence referendum.
His criticism came after Hannah Bardell, the SNP's business spokeswoman, warned the Government's apprenticeship levy could result in oil and gas firms being charged twice when it comes to training.
During last month's Spending Review and Autumn Statement, Chancellor George Osborne announced a levy on companies to fund apprenticeships will be set at 0.5% of an employer's pay bill.
This will come into force from April 2017 and is expected to raise £3 billion in an attempt to fund three million apprenticeships.
The Government says the levy will only be paid on employers' pay bills over £3 million, resulting in fewer than 2% of UK employers paying it.
Speaking in the Commons, Ms Bardell told Mr Boles: "As you will appreciate, the oil and gas industry faces its own distinct challenges at present and I know from my engagement with companies in the sector that there is significant concern that this levy may represent a second charge, with many oil and gas companies already paying levies to industry trading bodies.
"It also represents an additional cost to these companies at a time when controlling business costs is of paramount importance.
"Will you commit to meeting with I and my colleagues and a delegation from the industry to hear their concerns and discuss how the apprenticeship levy scheme can be designed to take account of these circumstances?"
Mr Boles replied: "Of course I'll be delighted to meet you and that delegation.
"But I'll be asking them what they thought of your party's plans for Scotland's economy that rested upon oil prices at a 100 (US) dollars a barrel, which would now see an independent Scotland entirely bankrupt and probably scuttling to the IMF (International Monetary Fund)."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article