Scottish Labour has called for the parliamentary rules to be changed to enable Holyrood to oppose UK-wide trade union reforms.
An attempt to use a legislative consent motion (LCM) to block the UK Government's Trade Union Bill has already been rejected by Scottish Parliament Presiding Officer Tricia Marwick.
The Scottish Government argued the Bill, which restricts the time employees can spend on union business and forbids the deduction of dues by direct debit, would impact on employee relations in its devolved agencies.
Mrs Marwick said this is not sufficient grounds for an LCM, designed so Westminster cannot legislate on devolved matters without Holyrood's consent.
Labour has questioned whether her ruling correctly applies the Parliament's standing orders.
The party's equality spokesman Neil Findlay has lodged a motion calling on all MSPs to consider what rule changes are required to amend parliamentary procedures to allow the LCM to be debated.
He said: "We believe the Presiding Officer's interpretation of Standing Orders is wrong.
"She has applied an overly-restrictive interpretation of the term 'executive competence' and, strangely, an overly-restrictive view of the right of the Scottish Parliament to police legislation that fundamentally changes the way that Scottish Government and public bodies can act as employers.
"The Tory Trade Union Bill will have an impact on workers in local authorities and other devolved areas like the civil service and police as well as many Scottish businesses. This is not an issue for Holyrood to wash its hands of.
"The SNP government must not give up the fight at the first hurdle. All parties that want to block this Bill should unite on this matter. "
It is understood any proposal for a rule change would require an inquiry by the Parliament's Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel