A COURT has rejected a prisoner's bid for a review into whether or not he has a "right" to be rehabilitated in jail.
Alex Keenan, who is currently serving a sentence of nine years and seven months, was seeking a judicial review looking at whether or not the state has a duty to provide him with courses to promote rehabilitation.
Currently, prisoners who have an indeterminate sentence, with no fixed date for their release, must be offered the chance to rehabilitate through courses and other measures.
However, those who have a determinate, fixed sentence - such as the sentence being served by Mr Keenan - do not have the same entitlement.
Mr Keenan will be eligible for parole on November 20 this year, but if he is not released at that point he will be freed on a non-parole licence in June 2018.
A Court of Session judgment on the case states that Mr Keenan was trying to show that "the respondents have failed to provide the petitioner with a means by which he could demonstrate to the Parole Board for Scotland that he no longer poses a risk to the public and therefore be eligible for release when first considered by the Parole Board".
Mr Keenan's lawyer also argued that there are parallels between long-term determinate prisoners and those serving indeterminate sentences which "give rise to similar duties" by the Scottish Ministers.
However, Judge Lord Boyd stated: "I am not persuaded that there are such parallels or, if there are, it gives rise to similar duties on behalf of the respondents."
The judge rejected the request for a judicial review claiming it had no reasonable prospects of success.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here