Twelve military sites set to be sold off in an attempt to generate £500 million and allow 15,000 homes to be built have been announced.
Defence minister Mark Lancaster told MPs the sales are the first part of a plan to free up enough Ministry of Defence (MoD) land for 55,000 homes.
Outside the Commons, the MoD said the sites are Kneller Hall in Twickenham; Claro and Deverell barracks in Ripon; RAF sites Molesworth and Alconbury in Cambridgeshire, and Mildenhall in Suffolk; Lodge Hill in Kent; Craigiehall in Edinburgh; HMS Nelson Wardroom in Portsmouth; Hullavington Airfield in Wiltshire; RAF Barnham in Suffolk; and MoD Felton in London.
Speaking in the Commons, Mr Lancaster said: "As part of the Government's prosperity agenda, the MoD is committed to releasing land for 55,000 housing units in this parliament.
"I'm delighted to announce the first 12 sites, which will contribute some £500 million of land receipts - which will be reinvested into defence and provide more than 15,000 potential housing units."
Mr Lancaster was replying to a question from Conservative Lucy Frazer (South East Cambridgeshire).
She asked: "Could you explain what steps the MoD is taking to release surplus land for housing and could you also explain what progress the MoD has made in selling or renting the fire control centre in Waterbeach?"
In his reply, Mr Lancaster said: "With regard to your own constituency, I can confirm the whole of the Waterbeach site has now been transferred to our civilian delivery partner."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here