Plans to plant 100 million trees in Scotland by the end of 2015 has been missed by more than 11m, it has been revealed.
The Scottish Government unveiled their target in 2010 as part of a bid to cut emissions across the country.
The growth of the nation's forests by 3.7 per cent was touted as a flagship scheme for the government - as it hoped to demonstrate Scotland could lead the way on tackling pollution and climate change.
But now it has been revealed that the 100m target has been missed by more than 11m.
The dramatic shortfalling has come after government officials faced difficulties negotiating with farmers and landowners.
The pledge was a part of an international drive by Climate Group - an international environment non-profit - to have 1bn new trees planted across the world.
In 2014 Forestry Commission figures showed that more than 5m trees were felled to make space for the new trees - but only 1.6m trees were planted in their place.
When the planting target was announced the National Farmers Union Scotland said "the blunt tool of diverting resources to planting trees on good agricultural land" was "a trap we must avoid."
Last year "frustrating" encounters between the forestry and farming sectors were described by Scottish parliament's rural affairs, climate change and environment committee as being a major hurdle for the planting project.
Speaking at the time the committee convener Rob Gibson said that there was "little positive evidence that farming and forestry interests are truly integrating and working together on the scale required to play their part in reducing Scotland's carbon emissions."
Environment minister Aileen McLeod responded: "Scotland is actually punching well above its weight when it comes to new planting right across the whole of the UK - we have delivered around two-thirds of all planting since 2010."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel