A police officer accused of giving a misleading account of a "Plebgate" meeting praised MP Andrew Mitchell for his "candour" before telling the media the politician had been evasive, a tribunal has heard.
Detective Sergeant Stuart Hinton and two other Police Federation representatives met the Tory MP at his constituency offices in October 2012, three weeks after Mr Mitchell was involved in a high-profile incident with Met Police officers in Downing Street.
Following the meeting, serving Warwickshire Police officer Mr Hinton made comments about what was said at that meeting in an interview on BBC Radio Five Live on October 13, which it is alleged were misleading.
A misconduct panel has been convened at the force headquarters to hear an allegation that the officer breached the force's professional standards of honesty, integrity and conduct.
Mr Hinton, who was secretary of the local Federation branch at the time, denies any wrong-doing.
A recording of the meeting with the Sutton Coldfield MP played to the tribunal heard that Mr Mitchell had opened the meeting with an apology saying he was "profoundly, deeply sorry".
Mr Hinton then asked him for his account of what he had said to officers at the gates of Downing Street.
The MP replied: "I did not say - and I give you my word - I did not call an officer a f****** pleb, and that you should know your f****** place."
Mr Mitchell also said: "I complied with the officer and picked up my bicycle and, you know, but I did say, you know, under my breath but audibly - in frustration, 'I thought you lot were supposed to f****** help us' - I did say that and it is for that I apologise."
Opening the case today, presenting officer Aaron Rathmell said that the next day, Mr Hinton appeared on BBC radio and commented: "He (Mr Mitchell) still won't say exactly what he did say, which suggests that the officer's account is more likely to be the accurate one."
During the interview he also backed a call for the then chief whip Mr Mitchell to resign.
Mr Rathmell said the police officer made these comments despite the MP giving what he described as a "positive" account of his exchange with Met officers on September 19 2012.
It was Mr Rathmell's case that Mr Hinton had seemed satisfied with the answers he heard in the meeting, telling Mr Mitchell: "I appreciate your candour," later telling him: "Everybody can have a bad day."
Mr Rathmell said: "The key controversy in this case surrounds exercising of judgment as to whether Sgt Hinton gave a misleading account regarding the meeting with Mr Mitchell, rather than facts or witnesses' statements being in dispute."
At the time, the Police Federation representatives were preparing to launch a campaign against Government budget cuts to policing.
The panel heard that before seeing the MP, Mr Hinton and his colleagues Inspector Ken Mackaill, of West Mercia, and Sgt Chris Jones, of West Midlands Police, were advised by their media strategist to use the meeting as "a springboard" for that campaign.
If the case is found to amount to gross misconduct, Mr Hinton could be sacked.
The hearing at Leek Wootton, near Warwick, which has been scheduled for up to three days, continues.
A judge ruled in 2014 that the MP probably did call Met officer PC Toby Rowland a "pleb" after the politician was stopped from riding his bicycle through the vehicle gate in Downing Street.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article