DRIVERS should be required to re-sit their practical test every five years after turning 70, according to older motorists.
The first survey of older drivers since 1996 found that a majority supported tighter rules and regulations, even if those checks resulted in them personally losing their licence.
The number of drivers over the age of 70 will double over the next 20 years and there are now over one million license holders over the age of 80.
At present, motorists are required to re-apply for their licence once they turn 70 and make a medical declaration to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA), but they are not required to undergo a medical or re-sit the driving test.
However, the poll of 2,600 motorists aged 55 to 101 found that 60 per cent supported the idea of over-70s sitting a practical test every five years to retain their driver's licence. More than half also backed a compulsory medical at 70, while 85 per cent said drivers should pass have to pass an eyesight test every five years once they have reached 70.
The findings of the survey, commissioned by the Institute of Advanced Motorists, contradicts the motoring group's own position that compulsory medicals and driving re-tests would be a "disproportionate action" for an age group that is generally one of the safest on the road.
Drivers aged 75 and over make up 6 per cent of all licence holders but account for just 4.3 per cent of deaths and serious injuries. In comparison, drivers under 21 make up 2.5 per cent of all licence holders but account for 13 per cent of deaths and serious injuries.
A spokesman for Age Scotland said: "Age Scotland does not support compulsory re-testing of drivers based on age alone. Ability, not age, should be the standard by which safety to drive is judged. Considering that everyone over a certain age should be presumed to be unsafe is a form of age discrimination."
Some high-profile cases have prompted calls for a licensing shake up, however. In 2013, 93-year-old Alice Ross was charged with causing death by dangerous driving after she passed out at the wheel in Caithness and killed cyclist Elaine Dunne, 30.
The charges were subsequently dropped but a fatal accident inquiry heard that she had suffered at least two unexplained blackouts prior to the crash and Mrs Dunne's widower, Christopher, called for tougher checks on older drivers.
Nearly all respondents to the IAM survey, carried out in collaboration with Warwick Medical School, agreed that GPs should be required to inform patients if their medical condition may affect their fitness to drive - although the researchers noted that "health professionals are often reluctant to advise a patient to cease driving".
Half of those questioned also agreed that a flexible licensing system should be introduced which could restrict types of roads and conditions for some older drivers.
However, the survey also found that half of older drivers "self-regulate to stay safe", by avoiding driving in challenging situations like busy traffic, after dark, in rush hour or bad weather.
Sarah Sillars, chief executive of the IAM chief executive, said the survey demonstrated that mature "are aware of the risks and support action to review their safety".
She added: “Voluntary self-assessment and better education via GPs are important techniques for helping drivers understand how long they can continue to drive safely for."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel