CONTROVERSIAL laws which will change the way Scottish universities are run have been attacked by some of the most powerful officials in the sector.
The intervention is significant because the chairs include high profile individuals from the worlds of law, banking, the media, education, business, religion, health and government.
The attack came as the Higher Education Governance (Scotland) Bill passes through the Scottish Parliament.
However, there is still confusion over plans to introduce new elected chairs of universities' powerful ruling Courts because Scotland's ancient institutions already have elected rectors who chair Court.
The letter to The Herald states: "The proposal put forward this month by the Scottish Government... that chairs of governing bodies should be chosen by a public election, which will inevitably be adversarial, will reverse the excellent progress that has been made towards achieving equality and diversity within this important role in higher education governance.
"No doubt unintentionally, the Bill’s proposals will have the effect of discouraging rather than encouraging candidates. None of us, including the 12 who have been appointed in the last two years, would have stood as a candidate in a publicly adversarial election for our role.
The unanswered questions over the reforms
"Good, diverse, inclusive and effective governance will be best delivered in future if Parliament retains the capacity for a governing body, that includes staff and student members, to elect its own chair."
The chairs go on to highlight the fact that elections to health boards were abandoned by the Scottish Government because they failed to attract a diversity of suitable candidates.
The letter adds: "While elections to political office are a fundamental part of our culture, they are not always the most appropriate way of making an appointment to every position.
"Elections to political office, or even to elected student officer roles, have resulted in disproportionately low representation of women and of people with protected characteristics.
"All of this runs counter to what the Bill purports to achieve, and what we, the people who are and remain responsible for good governance in higher education, strive for."
The attack comes just days after one of Scotland's most prestigious universities attacked the new laws as "inconsistent" and "incoherent".
However, Mary Senior, Scotland Official for the UCU lecturers' union, defended the Bill arguing that it was trying to make universities more open and transparent.
She said: "The proposals allow for universities to have a senior governor elected by all staff and students, and, in those institutions who currently have one, the position of rector to continue unabated.
"Only five out of 19 universities in Scotland have rectors at the moment so having an elected chair for the first time will make a real and positive difference to the remaining 14 who, up until now, have not had this democratic element in their governance structures."
Mary Senior, Scotland Official of the UCU lecturers' union
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “The Higher Education Governance Bill aims to ensure that the entire campus community has a say on how our higher education institutions are governed. We have worked closely with stakeholders, including the Chairs group, over the course of the Bill’s development, and continue to listen to their views which we are familiar with.
“We think that the post of senior lay member, who performs the key role of chair on the governing bodies of our institutions, should be an elected one. This role is pivotal in the leadership of all Scottish institutions, and all staff and students should have their say in appointing the best candidate for the role.”
The origins of the Bill date back to 2011 when a number of universities, including Glasgow and Strathclyde, brought forward course cuts.
Unions felt consultations with staff and students were rudimentary and decisions were motivated by economic considerations rather than academic ones.
There have also been long-running concerns over the spiralling salaries of principals and the increasing autonomy of their management teams.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel