CONTROVERSIAL changes to the way Scottish universities are run have come a step closer.
The Scottish Parliament's education committee backed amendments to the Scottish Higher Education Bill which is currently under scrutiny.
Last month, ministers backtracked over some of the new laws amid fears they would lead to greater ministerial interference in the sector.
However, there is still confusion over plans to introduce new paid, elected chairs of universities' powerful ruling Courts because Scotland's ancient institutions already have elected rectors who chair Court.
Despite the concerns Angela Constance, the Education Secretary, rejected opposition amendments which would have made the Bill more acceptable to the higher education sector.
Liz Smith, the young people spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservatives, said: "Despite the fact the Bill remains an utter shambles the SNP are intent on pressing ahead with deeply damaging reforms which will undermine the effective working of our higher education institutions.
“Instead of respecting the autonomy and diversity of the sector ministers want to impose a one size fits all structure so they can keep tighter control of what goes on in our universities."
Professor Sir Pete Downes, convener of Universities Scotland and principal of Dundee University, said: “This Bill has faced a barrage of criticism from the beginning as it is poorly evidenced, poorly drafted and a great number of stakeholders, including principals, fear it will weaken good governance and accountability and diversity in our universities rather than improve it.
“The Government has not brought forward any evidence of a problem that needs a solution and there is no evidence to support its proposals.
"Opposition parties asked the Cabinet Secretary to pause on the Bill and bring something better back at stage three, but the Bill presses on anyway. It is a very disappointing outcome."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “The Higher Education Governance Bill aims to ensure that the entire campus community has a say on how our higher education institutions are governed. We have worked closely with stakeholders over the course of the Bill’s development."
The origins of the Bill date back to 2011 when a number of universities, including Glasgow and Strathclyde, brought forward course cuts.
Unions felt consultations with staff and students were rudimentary and decisions were motivated by economic considerations rather than academic ones.
There have also been long-running concerns over the spiralling salaries of principals and the increasing autonomy of their management teams.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel