The Highland Council’s controversial plan to close four primary schools on Skye and replace them with a new community school, appears to have been dealt a fatal blow by a sheriff.
Education officials had advised councillors this would achieve the best and most sustainable educational provision for the north west of the island, given the small school rolls and poor condition of buildings.
But the local authority’s decision to close Edinbane, Knockbreck and Struan primaries, and build a new larger facility at Dunvegan for their combined rolls, was called in by ministers in May last year.
There was considerable parental opposition to the plans with claims that some pupils as young as four and a half, could be travelling much longer than the estimated 30 to 40 minutes council officials had estimated.
It was referred to the School Closure Review Panel for assessment. The following month the panel, in its first decision, refused to allow the Highland Council to proceed with its plans.
The local authority appealed the panel’s decision but a sheriff has now confirmed the panel’s decision.
Councillor Drew Millar, Chair of the Education, Children & Adult Services Committee said: "The council is disappointed at this decision. We have not yet had time to fully consider the written judgement, and will reflect further on these matters, once we have had an opportunity to do so. The council remains committed to providing the highest quality of education to the children of North West Skye."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here