A DRONE was flown within a few metres of a passenger jet landing at Heathrow Airport, continuing a recent spate of near misses.
The pilot of the Airbus A319 stated that the drone may have been just 20ft above and 25 yards to the left when it passed by the aircraft.
He told the UK Airprox Board (UKAB) that it was not possible to take avoiding action and the incident was put in the most serious risk category.
The jet was flying at an altitude of 500ft and was on the final approach to the airport on September 30 when the drone was spotted.
Officials said that the drone was flown against Civil Aviation Authority regulations because it did not have permission to be above 400ft within the Heathrow CTR control zone.
It was concluded that separation between the drone and the jet had been reduced to about a wingspan, described as “the bare minimum”, and that “chance had played a major part” in the avoidance of a collision.
Although a report was made to the police, the drone operator was not traced.
The UKAB noted that the drone had not shown up on radars.
Steve Landells, flight safety specialist at the British Airline Pilots Association, has previously called for designers to look at ways to make drones visible to air traffic controllers.
The latest monthly meeting on near-misses analysed a total of six possible incidents between aircraft and drones.
On October 2 the pilot of a Dornier Do328 short-haul jet - which typically has capacity for around 30 passengers - reported a drone passing his left wing by less than 50ft.
He believed it must have passed over the propeller and assessed there was a high risk of collision.
The incident occurred at an altitude of 3,000ft shortly after take off from Manchester Airport.
There has been a surge in reports of drone near-misses in recent months, with the UKAB published details of seven events after its December meeting.
They included a drone coming within metres of colliding with a jet above the Houses of Parliament on September 13.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel