The cost of building the new Forth crossing has fallen, MSPs have been told.
David Climbie of Transport Scotland said the bill is now expected to be between £1.325 billion and £1.35 billion, and he added that workers are "absolutely focused" on completing the new structure in time for it to open by the end of this year.
The project director for the Queensferry Crossing updated MSPs on Holyrood's Infrastructure and Capital Investment Committee on progress.
In 2009, the new crossing had been expected to cost up to £2.34 billion, he said, which was about £1 billion more than the figures.
Mr Climbie told the committee that when the new crossing was first considered in early 2007, "a 10-year time-scale was considered extremely challenging for a project of this size and complexity".
But he said: "We are still focused absolutely on achieving the original target date for opening to traffic and to a significantly reduced budget."
He added: "The site team has risen to the challenges of the past few months, and through their efforts and through the FCBC's (Forth Crossing Bridge Constructors) efficient management of equipment and resources, the principle contract for the Queensferry Crossing and approach roads continues on target for opening to traffic by the end of 2016.
"We are absolutely focused on the target date of having traffic on the bridge by the end of this year, no matter what happens, whether it be weather, whether it be unexpected events like the Forth Road Bridge closure, any other unexpected events."
The closure of the existing Forth Road Bridge to all traffic in December allowed staff building the new crossing to carry out work on surrounding roads during the daytime, rather than having to do this at night, he said.
Mr Climbie praised staff involved in delivering the new bridge, saying: "We've worked well over 10 million man hours on the project, we have a tremendous workforce on site, they have worked through some difficult conditions over the last six months or so and I think their dedication to the project and their pride in the project is very clear."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel