It was designed to promote the wonders of the Scots language but a new Scottish Government website has been attracting attention for the wrong reasons.
The site aims to encourage Scots to use the language of Robert Burns, Sir Walter Scott and Irvine Welsh.
However, its message seems to have been lost in translation, with Scots language experts insisting words on the site including 'taeilka', 'feckfupairt' and 'wirhameowerdaeinsan' do not exist and claiming their inclusion makes the site largely incomprehensible.
Michael Hance, the director of the Scots Language Centre, told The Times: "It's clearly not been edited correctly as some words don't mean anything at all. Something has clearly got lost in translation somewhere along the line.
"It would appear that whoever was commissioned to write it didn't have the chance to check it before it went online.
"It's unfortunate because it's likely that people went on to the site and thought, because they couldn't make sense of some words, that they didn't have a proper grasp of Scots."
One sentence on the site read: "Scots is aaroon us in wirhameowerdaeinsan it is a furthie, feckfupairt o Scottish culture the day."
Pauline Cairns, the senior editor of Scottish Language Dictionaries, said it appeared 'quite a few' of the words on the site had been run together.
The Scottish Government said it was aware of errors on the site and vowed to correct them.
A spokesperson said: "We recognise the Scots language is an essential part of our distinctive culture and heritage and we take seriously its promotion and preservation. We thank The Times for drawing these minor formatting errors to our attention.
"We will correct these as part of a review of these pages at the earliest opportunity."
The 2011 census revealed that 1.5 million people regularly speak Scots, with 58,000 using Gaelic.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel