THOUSANDS of female council employees expecting a major windfall as part of an equal pay dispute will have to wait months for any confirmation if victory amid warnings of premature celebrations.
Senior union figures and local authority sources have said the pay dispute involving around 6500 Glasgow City Council staff has several further months of legal wrangling before it comes to any conclusion.
It comes after leading lawyer Stefan Cross declared victory over the authority, predicting a total payout of £100million.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled in the council's favour in declaring their equal pay scheme since 2007 to be legal, but against it in two aspects of implementation.
Unison's Sam McCartney said: "The bottom line is that at this point in time its premature to say who has won or lost. How this will pan out will take much much more legal wrangling to get a resolution. And the figures bandied around are way in excess of what anyone can expect."
The Herald understands there are a range of options open to the parties which could see the saga drag on, with only an unlikely settlement at this stage likely to draw the curtains on it.
Either party could take the aspect of the claim they lost to the Court of Session or return to the Tribunal and request a fresh examination.
One senior source within the administration said: "Our advice is that this isn't quite as presented and that we shouldn't be overly concerned that we're going to have a whole new multi-million pound gap to fill.
"This is coming from senior officers. You'd hope they were correct."
Another said: "It's hard not see this declaration of victory as an attempt to scare other councils not as far down the road in their dispute as Glasgow."
A council spokesman said: “The tribunal has, again, ruled that the council’s job evaluation scheme is valid and in accordance with the relevant equal pay legislation.
“We are still carefully considering our position in terms of pay protection and assimilation.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here