A young boy has been giving evidence in the trial of a mother and her partner who are accused of murdering toddler Liam Fee.
Jurors were shown a pre-recorded interview with the child taken two days after the death of two-year-old Liam at a house in Fife in 2014.
He said he was with Rachel Trelfa or Fee, 31, and Nyomi Fee, 28, who deny murdering Trelfa's son Liam, on the day the toddler died.
The boy, who cannot be identified because of his age, is the child the pair are accused of falsely saying was responsible for Liam's death.
The High Court in Livingston was closed to the public as the recording of the social worker and police officer interviewing the boy was played.
Judge Lord Burns told jurors the boy's evidence should be taken in the same way as if he was in the court witness box and they heard it would take a long time to play the recordings.
In the video the boy said he went to a McDonald's earlier that day with the couple, another young boy and Liam and that the toddler was sitting in a high chair eating a Happy Meal.
He said he accompanied them to the property in Fife later and they were watching movies, eating food and playing with toys before Liam was put to bed.
He had also seen both women sitting in the living room drinking vodka, the court heard.
The murder charge alleges that the couple assaulted Liam at a house in Fife on various occasions between March 15 and March 22, 2014.
They also face a catalogue of allegations of wilfully ill-treating and neglecting two other young boys over a period of more than two years.
The pair are accused of falsely telling others, including police, that a young boy was responsible for Liam's death.
They deny all the charges.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article